It is inconceivable to undertake a slimming diet without knowing the caloric value of the allowances. The expert in dietary is as the adviser to which is appealed so that "it directs a company in crisis for a bad administration." If this adviser, after balancing the scale, abandons the company without having taught the directives the principles of a good administration it will have failed in his work, because the directives will make the same errors inevitably: at the little time the company is again in the same crisis situation again. The expert in dietary must program the reestablishment of the pondered balance (thinning),but at the same time debit side to teach the patient the rules of the recount of calories, because otherwise, when finishing the diet, the patient makes for ignorance the same errors again, with the result of the recovery of the lost kilos. The obese fellow, often considered a "great gluttonous", he/she is in fact a person that needs "to learn how to eat"

The patient therefore should know which the value of the is "circulating currency" that serves to nurture its organism, that is to say debit side to know how many calories he/she has each food that consumes day by day. To this respect, it can be of great help to mention some of the most illustrative prejudices here:

the grissini doesn’t put on weight:
it is a legend that the grissini is very good for the slimming diets. They have a humidity valued around 3%, in front of the humidity of the bread that can reach the 40 ~. To equality of weight, 100 g of grissini has a much higher caloric power that 100 g of bread, in the measure in that you/they are everything flour and fatty and they don’t contain water, that is to say the only element that doesn’t possess to be able to caloric; the caloric value of the bread is of approximately 250 calories for each 100 g, while the energy value of the grissini is of around 400 calories for each 100 g (the fellow that 100 g of grissini eats with the food is as if he/she ate but of 150 g of bread) consequently, the grissini puts on weight more than the bread due to its biggest caloric power;

the rice doesn’t put on weight:
the rice is a complete, healthy, nutritious food and of superior digestibility to all the other ones farinaceous. This incorporated one fundamentally, and the same as the pastas, for hydrates of carbon, it has a short permanency in the stomach and it releases in the intestine and with a high grade of absorption, giving place to a quick reappearance of the appetite. For this reason the rice, contrary to as much as one believes, it can be very useful in the diets fattening, while it is not adapted in the slimming ones. Their high digestibility is due to the almost total absence of cellulose, that makes him to be specially suitable in the intestinal inflammatory affections (colitis, enteritis, etc.), in the measure in that it requires little work on the part of the digestive roads;

the fresh cheese doesn’t put on weight:
the dairy like the white cheese, the fresh cheese, the cream of milk, etc. is considered not very nutritious and without fat; in fact these dairy possesses a fatty percentage of around 20% and its caloric value is not at all under: 100 g of semi-greasy cheese provides 340 calories; 100 g of cheese meager 334 calories and 100 g of cream of milk 269 calories. These data are not reconfortantes if one keeps in mind that a normal portion of semi-greasy cheese of about 200 g has a value of some 600 calories, superior to the one from a plate of noodles to the Bolognese one (590 calories), to that of a fillet of ox of 200 g (586 calories), to that of a portion of fruit tart (535 calories), to that of a plate of pasta with butter (509 calories) or to that of a spaghetti plate with tomato (463 calories).

There are people that eat fresh cheese to lose weight at night, accompanied by a slice of bread, and then they eat up an abundant mixed salad very seasoned with oil, everything watered it with a good one came, after that which you/they rise of the sure table of having eaten very little and clever to compensate up-to-date following, to the smallest sign of fatigue, the "I fast nocturne" with coffees with milk and brioches. The calculation of the calories of so "frugal food" it shows that, stingy cheese, bread and oil, an ingestion of some 1.000 calories takes place, what corresponds to a rational diet fattening;

the special allowances,
as the pasta hypocaloric (to the gluten), the bread and the integral pastas, the cheese "light", the skimmed yogurt, etc. doesn’t put on weight: it is really allowances hypocaloric, but only in comparison with the corresponding products normal present in the market, for what the difference in calories that it characterizes them is very small. The pastas to the gluten possess 362 calories, in front of the 368 calories of the normal pasta; the integral bread has 240 calories, in front of the 276 calories of the white bread; the fresh cheese of cow has 250 calories in front of the 340 calories of the fatty cheese; the yogurt of milk semi skimmed has 51 calories in front of the 72 calories of that of whole milk;

the wine, the beer, the liquors, the Coca Cola, the orangeade, the fruit juices,
etc. non very fat often, for the single fact of being liquid, these drinks are not neither so at least kept in mind as possible sources of calories. In fact, the water doesn’t only have calories, while any other drink should be considered a liquidate-food because he/she has calories.

If we analyze them for separate and always considering 100 g, we see that the dry white wine provides 65 calories, the wine tints dry 70 calories, the wine sweet 145 calories, the brandy 298 calories, the beer 51 calories, the sweet liquors some 500 calories, a syrup of fruit 310 calories, a juice of fruit 310 calories, the juice of orange 50 calories, the juice of grape 63 calories and the Coca Cola some 110 calories.

It is very easy, mainly in summer, to increase in an important way the daily ingestion of calories through the consumption of drinks that you/they should always be kept in mind when carrying out the caloric recount;

the saccharin and other synthetic sweeteners don’t put on weight:
a saccharin tablet substitutes to a teaspoonful of sugar, with a value of 20 calories, If 5 up-to-date tablets are used, they are hardly saved at the end of the day to avoid 100 calories. The use of the saccharin can be considered valid during a diet hypocaloric when the saving of some how many calories can favour the ingestion of much nobler allowances that the sugar, being in. I change ridiculous their habitual use when other sources of calories, much richer, are not neither so at least kept in mind

The dietary one is mathematical science applied to the medicine and consequently there is that approach, so punishes of failing in the dietary program The dietary calculation of the calories it is very exact expressed in grams, for what is not possible to value the quantity of admitted allowances by sight; it is necessary to weigh all the ingredients using a scale that can estimate variations of at least 10 g-

Any importance is not generally given since to the transgressions that can be made along the day, it is considered that many small errors don’t influence in the final result.

All calorie above the admitted ones must be kept in mind, since the sum of many small errors, fruit of the temptations of the indulgence toward oneself and mainly of the prizes like recompense to the stringency with the one that the diet is continued, they can make that until the strictest in the diets hypocaloric he/she staggers.

Tags: calories